Girl Meets Geekdom

Alive and Kicking!

Games 4 Girls Competition Results Are In!

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006 at 12:15 am

…And we won 1st place!!! (Despite the fact that at least one of the three judges thought it was a single player game…)

I’m not suppose to make a big deal about it yet, since the official website is not yet up…but I figured it’s not like I get a LOT of traffic at this website anyway. However, just to respect that not making a big deal part, I’ll save my comments for another post, especially after the games become available for download.

I really wished I knew about all these competitions when I was younger. It’s so sad that this will be my last chance to participate in student competitions.

Some girls just can’t jump…

Sunday, April 9th, 2006 at 8:18 pm

Last Friday the Game Initiative at Cornell hosted a lab session for a group of pre-freshman women in engineering, where they had a chance to play the student games that have been made at Cornell. Unsurprisingly, none of the women considered themselves “core gamers” but it seemed that most of these women hadn’t played a game at all in the recent past, Solitare included. Even more surprising was the fact that Penguin Adventure, the game I expected to be most popular with this particular group, proved to be rather problematic with many of the girls.

Sure, Penguin Adventure is not exactly an easy game, but when it comes down to dealing with the core mechanics, some women just can’t jump. And when I say can’t jump, I mean they REALLY can’t jump in any of the games that required jumping. Watching some of these women was like watching a first-time pianist attempt Moonlight Sonata. These people had difficulties timing their jumps. When they got stuck, they would carefully position themselves for a jump, then press the arrow and spacebar at the same time, thus missing their mark. At one point, one group of girls gave up and requested to try out a game without jumps.

In a recent lecture at Cornell (that I missed), one researcher in cognitive studies noted gender differences in perception as a way of explaining the gender gap in video game audiences. Women, for example, tend to face more difficulty perceiving 3D rotations, and therefore tend not to play first-person shooters. Is the difference in cognitive skill the reason why a game as simple as Penguin Adventure can cause so much trouble for some women?

I had always considered platformers to be a gender-neutral genre. For that reason, the game we submitted for the Games 4 Girls competition was a platformer. Now, all of a sudden I’m wondering how girl-oriented our games is. Was this not able to jump phenomenon specific to this group of girls because of their inexperience with gaming? Or is there some gender difference in terms of cognitive skill that effect these women’s ability to time the jumps? Are platformers really as gender neutral as one would expect?

The Weekend of the 24-Hour Mobile Game Design Competition

Wednesday, March 15th, 2006 at 1:59 pm

24 straight hours of work, 32 hours of non-sleep, 5 Cornell Students, 1 faculty member, 1 mobile game.

This past weekend was the Mobile Game Mosh, a 24-hour game design competition hosted by Parson’s in NYC. The goal: design and make a game for a cell phone in 24 hours. We went, we worked, and we did pretty well.

What it was like:
10AM

Our team, “Two Bit Operation” , consisting of myself, Brenda Chen, John Berges, Chris John, Hari Nathan, and our faculty advisor Mohan, arrive at Parsons.

10:30AM

Tutorial time…they had problems making the multiplayer flash demo work…so immediately we decided against that…

Noon

Envelope opens, we find out the four verbs that define our design constraints: suck, grip, conjure, and fade. John proceeds to celebrate over the words “grip” and “suck.”

1PM

We start making our game in Gamemaker.

2PM

Lunch, yaaaaaay!

4PM
Overdosed on Tylenol Cold…you’re suppose to take it every 6 hours not 4!

7PM
Dinner

8:00PM

Broke out the first caffeine drink…much more to come….

8:30PM

First wave of professional game designers arrive to critique our game. First piece of advice: “Lay off the vitamin c.”

9:00PM

Major redesign

2:00AM
Pizza!

Noon
I don’t remember what happened between 2:00-noon…but we finished

Consumption (whole team):
8tbsp - Tylenol Cold Medicine
2 cans – Starbucks double shot
~15 cans – Red Bull
~40 pieces – Halls Vitamin C

Interestingly enough, the contest was partially sponsored by Red Bull…so we had an unlimited supply…

Our finished game, entitled Vac-Attack, was a sort of Tetris-like block game where you can suck in blocks and shoot them out in attempts to collide it with other blocks. Unfortunately, I think that’s all I can say…and I can’t put up a copy of the game for download because we signed our rights away too Atari when the contest started…but it’s all good.

We finished runner up in the Top Game category. The winning game, Moth, was a puzzle game developed in Flash by a group of graduate students…so I’d say they had some edge over us.

There should be press about the event out around this time, including Gamasutra and Electronic Gaming Monthly who were with us for the whole 24 hours. Also, a number of New York newspapers covered the event. Here’s the press:

  • Here is an article about me in Chinese.
  • An article in the New York Metro featuring Brenda asleep on a tablet and the rest of the team (except Hari) in the background, as well as a quote from me.
  • The full Gamasutra coverage of the event…including a picture of me looking like a supernerd (I was sick that day, not my fault)

Anyway, it was a very exciting event…too bad I won’t be a student next year to do it again…

Next up: The Games 4 Girls Game design competition, entries due this week…wish me luck!

My future begins at EA

Sunday, February 12th, 2006 at 2:44 am

It’s been a rough week. On top of finalizing the mess of a course schedule I had this semester, Friday was also the day in which I had to decide between job offers from Microsoft and EA. In the end, I chose EA.

Sure, it might seem very clear cut that a girl who blogs about graphics and game design would go for the game company, but it really was a tough call. Microsoft gave an incredibly generous job offer and the prospect of a management and feature design role as a program manager. Not to mention, the team that extended the offer was Pix Experience – a team that works with human-computer interaction, digital photography, takes random photography breaks on sunny days, and has DDR in one of their “meeting rooms.” If there was a perfect team at Microsoft that was not games-related, that was it.

So despite all this, why did I choose EA? First of all Dilbert makes fun of the position that I would’ve taken at Microsoft. Not that I actually took that into consideration. I just found it amusing while I was contemplating. A significant (and real) factor in my decision deals with my overwhelming preference for a place that carries a bit of familiarity. I’m not worried about making new friends, but I’ve been restarting in new places half my life. For once, I’d like to be in place that didn’t feel temporary. Plus, I think that people who don’t factor friends, family, and people in general into their career decisions are really missing a part of the big picture. It’s not just about networking. People inspire ideas, they get you involved in projects, and can add greatly to overall happiness. And at the risk of sounding like a fortune cookie, happiness is key to success. Also, there’s the fact that I spent three years targeting myself for a job on a production team in the entertainment industry. If there was anything I learned from Cornell, it is that success comes as a result of using your skills to its full potential, which EA wins out on. Then there’s that game industry factor. Even if I went to Microsoft, I’d want to go back into games, and, in the game industry, nothing can really stand in for industry experience.

I am hoping, like many others, to someday be a game designer. I will be getting my start at EA as a technical artist in EA Redwood Shores…hopefully on the Sims 3.

Oscar Nominations for Animated Feature

Wednesday, February 1st, 2006 at 12:18 am

In this article I named my three guesses for the animations that will be nominated for Best Animated Feature this year. I got two out of three. The nominees are Wallace and Gromit, Corpse Bride, and Howl’s Moving Castle (I guess Madagascar instead, but I’m glad it did not get nominated). Unfortunately no CG animations this year, but still a good selection. My guess for winner? Wallace and Gromit…but I still have yet to see Howl’s Moving Castle, so we’ll have to see.

« Previous PageNext Page »